|
The Setting
What
Happened Next
Making the Most
of Opportunities
Results
The Setting
Civil War sites abound in history-rich Virginia,
but finding and interpreting them was a job
left to the visitor. Many war-related places
were unknown outside their vicinities
and others faced possible destruction by
commercial and residential development.
Wasn’t there some way to save the sites at
risk, capitalize on the vast untapped tourism
potential, and make the tourist’s experience
more pleasant and informative?
Avid history buffs from around the country travel to Virginia
annually to visit the battlegrounds of lore: Manassas, Petersburg,
Wilderness. But if you didn’t grow up in the Commonwealth
of Virginia, odds are that many of the events, people, and places
there that tell the story of the American Civil War are only
barely known to you. There are hundreds of sites in this state—where
more than 60 percent of that bloody war was waged—that
bespeak history better than any textbook ever could. Yet, even
the most diligent
amateur historian would have trouble routing out the myriad details
of the battles, sieges, and machinations of an intricate conflict
waged by skilled military leaders and home-grown warriors alike.
“We have close to 300 sites that tell a piece of the tale
of Civil War, right here in our state,” says Jack Berry,
director of the Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). “But
no two places were talking to each other. No two jurisdictions
were conferring on how best to put their history to work and
build a solid base for heritage tourism and economic development.”
To be fair, promoting its own history has always been a big
priority in the Old Dominion. Almost since the very day in 1865
when Lee surrendered his Confederate forces to Grant at Appomattox,
dedicated enthusiasts have made sure visitors are aware of the
significance of Virginia’s contributions and sacrifices
in the war. In the 1920s, the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) installed roadside historical markers along routes where
armies advanced or retreated or where skirmishes and battles
were waged. But these markers stood alone. It was up to the intrepid
traveler to seek them out or, more likely, stumble across them.
Then there were all the places only locals knew about. Some
places may not have played as significant
a role in the war’s outcome, but their participation is
nonetheless interesting to tourists. Yet, with limited
to no marketing budgets or experience, those sites languished,
at risk of permanently being forgotten.
So there sat this state, loaded with as much American history
as you could stuff into its boundaries. But without a cohesive,
well-coordinated, heavily marketed tourism campaign, it was losing
potential revenue. The historical resources were all there. But
who could pull them together and how?
“I think it’s important to get across that
a program of this size and magnitude only happens through
collaboration. We’ve had an overwhelming amount of
participation across all segments of the state population—from
private citizens
to state agencies. No one person did this by themselves.”
—
Jack Berry, director, Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau |
What Happened Next
Responding to the upsurge in Civil War interest spurred by Ken
Burns’s popular 1992 PBS television series, “The
Civil War,” staff at the Petersburg National Battlefield
Park proposed updating and enhancing the old roadside historical
markers to improve the visitor experience at Civil War sites.
In 1995, with an Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act
(ISTEA) grant from VDOT, a coalition of municipalities, historians,
marketing specialists, and National Park Service (NPS) staff
created Lee’s Retreat, a 20-stop driving tour through six
counties connecting Petersburg to Appomattox. A detailed brochure
map plus a series of directional signs, strategically placed
by VDOT along relevant corridors, leads tourists to sites where
historical markers are augmented by informative radio transmissions.
News of the Lee’s Retreat trail seeped out to other Virginia
jurisdictions and private landowners who had all struggled over
the years to preserve their historic assets while generating
income from them. People started asking Jack Berry why they couldn’t
do the same sort of trail in other parts of the state. Berry
and his colleagues began brainstorming. “We thought: What
if we linked the sites that told the tale of what preceded Lee’s
retreat to Appomattox and created a statewide system of thematic
trails, managed at the state level?” he recalls.
The Richmond CVB conducted an intensive letter-writing and phone-calling
campaign to all jurisdictions in the state, contacting the Virginia
Association of Counties, the Virginia Municipal League, and all
the convention and visitors bureaus, among others, to garner
support and cooperation for a statewide Civil War Trails project.
In the summer of 1995, with the first trail up and running and
a second in the works, Mitch Bowman came on board as part-time
director. He coordinated regional meetings to bring together
historians, NPS staff, jurisdictional and regional leaders, and
private site owners who, together, selected sites, planned additional
trails, conducted research, and applied for ISTEA funding.
The funds, which required matching monies from the sites, were
allocated according to need. Full-blown, established Civil War
sites, such as national battlefields and museums, required very
little money while other, previously unmarked sites needed considerably
more money for the construction of roadside pull-offs, plus
the research, writing, manufacturing, and installation of roadside
markers. These efforts resulted in the opening of the Lee vs.
Grant: The Overland Campaign trail in the summer of 1996. By
the following spring, Bowman was brought on board as full-time
director of the newly organized Virginia Civil War Trails (VCWT)
initiative. Two months later, the 1862 Peninsula Campaign trail
was inaugurated.
In late 1997, with three tours in place
and the VCWT newly incorporated, the Virginia Tourism Corporation
(VTC) became an active partner to promote the state program.
VTC pays for the toll-free information number and postage on
all materials sent out in response to requests. They also include
the VCWT program in print and media advertising for the state.
Throughout 1998 and 1999, two more trails were researched, produced
and opened, bringing the tally of VCWT sites
to 260 along 5 thematic trails that run through 79 cities and
counties. VDOT has installed 800 trailblazer signs along roads
throughout the state to help motorists reach their destinations.
Engaging, user-friendly brochures outline each trail in detail
with maps, driving instructions, and history. More than 200 interpretive
signs are in place along the five trails.
In early 2000, VCWT received its nonprofit 501(c)(3) status
and hired a part-time
marketing coordinator. The staff is supported by a 12-member
volunteer board and 30 volunteer committee members. Now, with
a full-fledged organization behind it, the VCWT continues to
plan for the program’s growth, establishing Internet gift
shops and an electronic passport
system to track visitors along the route.
But before leaping too far into the future, VCWT staff have
addressed the very real concern of keeping the trails in good
condition. Mitch Bowman notes that organizations “often
overlook that the maintenance, marketing, and manicuring of the
trail will require as much work as building it did in the first
place.”
An adopt-a-sign membership program has been set up for counties
that want to pay an annual contribution based on the
number of interpretive signs in their areas. Prices are $500
per sign up to four signs, then less for each subsequent sign.
This income supports 60 percent of VCWT’s ongoing operating
and maintenance costs but, as importantly, “it instills
a sense of custodial responsibility for the signs along the trail,” explains
Bowman. With the installation of expensive interpretive signs
around the state, a local eyes-and-ears effort is a necessity
to prevent or repair damage. “It’s the grass-roots
support that will keep the program going long after the initial
grant projects have been completed,” declares Bowman.
“The Virginia Civil War Trails provide structure—for
travelers to help them experience a sequence of events tied
to the landscape; for communities to allow them to be part
of a statewide effort with only a modest investment; for
the state to help it capture visitors interested in the niche
market of the Civil War; and for preservationists to actively
participate in the safe-keeping of Civil War sites.”
—
Mitch Bowman |
Making the Most of Opportunities
 Collaborate: Partners
at the state and local levels sustain this program. VCWT is the
architect of the trails—producing,
installing, and maintaining the signs and radio transmitters,
supervising the construction of trail enhancements such as wayside
stops, and producing trail brochures. Promotion and marketing
is left largely to the VTC. Preservation groups step in, securing
easements or buying land, when Civil War sites are endangered.
VCWT and VDOT collaborate on numerous levels regarding wayside
stops and directional signs, not to mention funding. City and
county planners and local politicians help by supporting the
program and eliminating red tape.
Find
the Fit between the Community and Tourism: Local historians
research and develop preliminary information to interpret each
trail, thereby assuring that the portions of their communities
that want to be promoted are. The information is sent to the
statewide history
committee, which includes representatives from all five regional
history
committees as well as experts at the state level, such as the
DHR historian, who
is responsible for the road markers. VCWT staff use the historical
information to develop copy and layout for the signs and brochures.
The final copy is reviewed once more by local and state historians
before going to press. Input from local historians and citizens
helps to identify the campaign or theme for each trail and locals
provide the final review process before the information
is put into print.
 Make
Sites and Programs Come Alive: VCWT seeks out human-interest
stories associated with the war and incorporates the stories
through quotes and anecdotes into the brochures and interpretive
signs along the trails. At Pamplin Park, Civil War weekends feature
costumed interpreters, weapons demonstrations, music, and a Sunday
sermon from the era. During the summer, children can participate
in hands-on Civil War drills.
Focus
on Quality and Authenticity: VCWT effectively balances
local input with a comprehensive review process
to ensure accuracy and authenticity. For example, to create signs
for sites important to the African-American experience, VCWT
includes local historians, staff from the U.S. Colored Troops
Memorial in Washington, D.C., as well as the Douglass Institute
of Government’s think-tank as part of the review team.
By including specialized experts, VCWT can identify and rectify
any errors before signs are manufactured.
Preserve
and Protect Resources: “By
generating interest in these Civil War sites, we have created
a preservation
catalyst at the grass-roots level,” says Mitch Bowman.
For example, VCWT placed an interpretive marker adjacent to a
Presbyterian Church that served
as a field hospital during the Battle of McDowell. The site’s
heightened visibility inspired the Highland County Historical
Society to raise funds to buy an adjacent field in order to protect
the land. As
the interpretive sign explains, the field served as the Union
position during
the battle.
Results
- Virginia has a coherent, centrally managed, statewide
story about the Civil War to tell visitors. The signs, brochures,
and wayside stops provide a quality, tangible product that the
tourism industry can sell to individuals as well as groups. The
program is even expanding beyond the state’s borders to
Maryland where
the same distinctive Civil War Trails logo will be used in that
statewide effort.
-
The in-depth experience provided by VCWT encourages repeat
visits and provides more attractions to keep visitors in Virginia
longer. Eighty percent of the trails are in rural areas, bringing
tourists to previously unvisited parts of the state. This is
a most significant fact, says Bowman, who defines
a trail as an interpreted, chronological
progression along a historic road trace. “
In other words,” he says, “the trail system takes
travelers along rural roads, just as the soldiers traversed the
countryside.”
- The increased attention that the trails have brought
to Virginia’s Civil War sites has helped to build community
pride and grass-roots support for Civil War preservation efforts.
Of the 260 sites featured on
the trails, 193 had never been interpreted before becoming part
of the trails program.
- Visits to Civil War sites in Virginia jumped from 500,000
in 1996 to 580,000 in 1997. A statewide study shows that Civil
War
driving travelers spend more than other pleasure travelers, ($71
per day as compared to $50). Nine percent of all Virginia travelers
included a Civil War site in their travel plans.
- Fifty motorcoach waysides have been
created to provide vantage points for groups to view significant
Civil War sites. The
addition of these parking areas for motorcoaches has helped to
increase the appeal
of the trails for large group tours.
Virginia Civil War Trails:
www.civilwar-va.com
“
Organizing and implementing this type of detailed,
collaborative program is like eating an elephant.
Take one bite at a time and pace yourself.”
— Jack Berry, executive director,
Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau |
Click here for Story Credits
The Setting
What Happened Next
Making the Most of Opportunities
Results
|